Internet-Draft RoQ qlog event definitions July 2024
Engelbart & Ott Expires 2 January 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-engelbart-qlog-roq-events-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Experimental
Expires:
Authors:
M. Engelbart
Technical University of Munich
J. Ott
Technical University of Munich

RoQ qlog event definitions

Abstract

This document describes concrete qlog event definitions and their metadata for RTP over QUIC [I-D.draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic] related events. These events can then be embedded in the higher level schema defined in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema].

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

The latest revision of this draft can be found at https://mengelbart.github.io/draft-engelbart-qlog-roq-events/draft-engelbart-qlog-roq-events.html. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-engelbart-qlog-roq-events/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/mengelbart/draft-engelbart-qlog-roq-events.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 2 January 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

This document describes the values of the qlog name ("category" + "event") and "data" fields and their semantics for RTP over QUIC ([I-D.draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic]).

2. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

The event and data structure definitions in this document are expressed in the Concise Data Definition Language [RFC8610] and its extensions described in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema].

TODO: Check if we need all these imports:

The following fields from [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema] are imported and used: name, category, type, data, group_id, protocol_type, importance, RawInfo, and time-related fields.

As is the case for [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema], the qlog schema definitions in this document are intentionally agnostic to serialization formats. The choice of format is an implementation decision.

3. Overview

This document describes how RoQ can be expressed in qlog using the schema defined in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema]. RoQ events are defined with a category, a name (the concatenation of "category" and "event"), an "importance", and "data" fields.

When any event from this document is included in a qlog trace, the "protocol_type" qlog array field MUST contain an entry with the value "RoQ".

3.1. Usage with QUIC

The events described in this document can be used with or without logging the related QUIC events defined in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events]. If used with QUIC events, the QUIC document takes precedence in terms of recommended filenames and trace separation setups.

If used without QUIC events, it is recommended that the implementation assign a globally unique identifier to each RoQ connection. This identifier can then be used as the value of the qlog "group_id" field, as well as the qlog filename or file identifier, potentially suffixed by the vantagepoint type (For example, abcd1234_server.qlog would contain the server-side trace of the connection with identifier abcd1234).

4. RoQ Event Overview

This document defines events in the roq category.

As described in Section 3.4.2 of [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema], the qlog "name" field is the concatenation of category and type.

Table 1 summarizes the name value of each event type that is defined in this specification.

Table 1: RoQ Events
Name value Importance Definition
roq:stream_opened Base Section 5.1
roq:stream_packet_created Core Section 5.2
roq:stream_packet_parsed Core Section 5.3
roq:datagram_packet_created Core Section 5.4
roq:datagram_packet_parsed Core Section 5.5

5. RoQ Events

RoQ events extend the $ProtocolEventData extension point defined in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema].

RoQEventData = RoQStreamOpened /
               RoQStreamPacketCreated /
               RoQStreamPacketParsed /
               RoQDatagramPacketCreated /
               RoQDatagramPacketParsed

$ProtocolEventData /= RoQEventData
Figure 1: RoQEventData definition and ProtocolEventData extension

RoQ events are logged when a certain condition happens at the application layer, and there isn't always a one to one mapping between RoQ and QUIC events. The exchange of data between the RoQ and QUIC layer is logged via the "stream_data_moved" and "datagram_data_moved" events in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events].

5.1. RoQ Stream Opened

The stream_opened event is emitted when a new QUIC stream for sending RoQ packets is opened. It has Base importance level; see Section 9.2 of [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema].

RoQStreamOpened = {
    flow_id: uint64
    stream_id: uint64
}
Figure 2: RoQStreamOpened definition

5.2. RoQ Stream Packet Created

The stream_packet_created event is emitted when a RoQ packet to be sent on a QUIC stream is created. It has Core importance level; see Section 9.2 of [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema].

This event is not necessarily the same as when the packet is passed to the QUIC layer. For that, see the stream_data_moved event in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events].

RoQStreamPacketCreated = {
    ~RoQPacket
    stream_id: uint64
}
Figure 3: RoQStreamPacketCreated definition

5.3. RoQ Stream Packet Parsed

The stream_packet_parsed event is emitted when a RoQ packet received from a QUIC stream is parsed. It has Core importance level; see Section 92. of [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema].

The event is not necessarily the same as when the packet is received from the QUIC layer. For that see stream_data_moved event in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events].

RoQStreamPacketParsed = {
    ~RoQPacket
    stream_id: uint64
}
Figure 4: RoQStreamPacketParsed definition

5.4. RoQ Datagram Packet Created

The roq_datagram_packet_created event is emitted when a RoQ packet to be sent in a QUIC Datagram is created. It has Core importance level; see Section 9.2 of [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema].

This event is not necessarily the same as when the packet is passed to the QUIC layer. For that, see the datagram_data_moved event in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events].

RoQDatagramPacketCreated = {
    ~RoQPacket
}
Figure 5: RoQDatagramPacketCreated definition

5.5. RoQ Datagram Packet Parsed

The datagram_packet_parsed event is emitted when a RoQ packet received in a QUIC Datagram is parsed. It has Core importance level; see Section 92. of [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema].

The event is not necessarily the same as when the packet is received from the QUIC layer. For that see datagram_data_moved event in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events].

RoQDatagramPacketParsed = {
    ~RoQPacket
}
Figure 6: RoQDatagramPacketParsed definition

6. RoQ Data Field Definitions

The following data field definitions can be used in RoQ events.

6.1. RoQ Packet

RoQPacket = {
  flow_id: uint64
  length: uint64
}
Figure 7: RoQPacket definition

6.2. RoQ Application Error

RoQApplicationError = "roq_no_error" /
                      "roq_general_error" /
                      "roq_internal_error" /
                      "roq_packet_error" /
                      "roq_stream_creation_error" /
                      "roq_frame_cancelled_error" /
                      "roq_unknown_flow_id_error" /
                      "roq_expectation_unmet_error"
Figure 8: RoQApplicationError definition

The RoQApplicationError extends the general $ApplicationError definition in the qlog QUIC definition, see [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema].

$ApplicationError /= RoQApplicationError

7. Security Considerations

The security and privacy considerations discussed in [I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema] apply to this document as well.

8. IANA Considerations

TODO

9. Normative References

[I-D.draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic]
Ott, J., Engelbart, M., and S. Dawkins, "RTP over QUIC (RoQ)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic-10, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic-10>.
[I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema]
Marx, R., Niccolini, L., Seemann, M., and L. Pardue, "Main logging schema for qlog", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema-08, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-quic-qlog-main-schema-08>.
[I-D.draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events]
Marx, R., Niccolini, L., Seemann, M., and L. Pardue, "QUIC event definitions for qlog", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events-07, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events-07>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8610]
Birkholz, H., Vigano, C., and C. Bormann, "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures", RFC 8610, DOI 10.17487/RFC8610, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610>.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lucas Pardue for their valuable comments and suggestions contributing to this document.

Authors' Addresses

Mathis Engelbart
Technical University of Munich
Jörg Ott
Technical University of Munich