The RekallRevealed website at www.rekallrevealed.org is run by RekallWeb. Whether or not this is a good use of RekallWeb is open to discussion, but it does put our money where our mouths are! Lets have a look at one of the pages from the website. It is one that is not normally seen by viewers, but is used to update entries in the Mike's Blog section.
The two images below show the Blog Editor form; the first image is the form running inside Rekall itself, and while the second shows the form through the web interface (accessed via KDE's web browser konqueror):
The major differences are that the Rekall version shows the standard menu and tool bars, which do not appear in the web version (for consistency, the form could be changed so that the menu and toolbars are not displayed). In konqueror there is a tab bar; this is an artefact of konqueror and would not show in, say, FireFox.
Apart from that, things are visually pretty much the same. The layout is the same, the fonts are the same (plus or minus outstanding bugs, and any browser specific settings, like minimum font sizes). But, so much for visual similarity, what about functional similarity?