Ask your questions here.
Post a reply

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Thu Apr 28, 2016 6:28 pm

We might get (maybe the first) ascii live-image out of this!

Posting from it now.

Code:
root@refracta:/home/user# cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=(loop)/live/vmlinuz boot=live findiso=/ascii/ascii_current.iso nomce apm=power-off lang=en_GB timezone=Europe/London noprompt noeject swap

root@refracta:/home/user# cat [/]etc/devuan_version
ascii/ceres

root@refracta:/home/user# uname -r
4.5.0-1-amd64

root@refracta:/home/user# cat [/]etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00defaultrelease
APT::Default-Release "ascii";

root@refracta:/home/user# apt update
#SNIP
root@refracta:/home/user# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

root@refracta:/home/user# dpkg -l|grep systemd|grep -v nosystemd
root@refracta:/home/user#


Thanks nadir, this would not have happened without your input.

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:20 pm

These are the packages from angband.pl, for which the devuan versions seem to need libsystemd0. One or more of angband.pl's util-linux related packages broke bash-completion, I had to downgrade them all to devuan.

dbus
dbus-x11
libdbus-1-3
libdbus-1-dev
libpolkit-agent-1-0
libpolkit-backend-1-0
libpolkit-gobject-1-0
libpulse0
openssh-client
openssh-server
openssh-sftp-server
policykit-1
rpcbind
xserver-common
xserver-xorg-core

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Thu Apr 28, 2016 11:18 pm

FYI - antiX testing nosystemd repo is up to date. But, as is mentioned, testing/sid is a moving target so it may be out of date in a day or so.

Also if running testing/sid - you probably need to install xserver-xorg-legacy

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Fri Apr 29, 2016 12:13 am

Thanks anti for that info. I see only the .deb binaries, are the sources for antiX nosystemd builds posted anywhere?

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Fri Apr 29, 2016 10:46 am

They are there somewhere (LOL). It is a bit of a mess.

(testing)
http://antix.daveserver.info/repo/testing/nosystemd/
(sid)
http://antix.daveserver.info/repo/sid/nosystemd/

Since testing is almost the same as sid (at the time of posting) the sources might be in sid repo rather than testing.

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:53 pm

I see the sources in the sid repo, thanks. I would like to test the antiX nosystemd builds but can't configure apt for the repo. (Release 404 Not Found). Maybe I'm doing something wrong?

In the meantime, out of curiosity I upgraded my chroot to unstable (ceres). This fixed a few problems and the resulting live image (yes, it boots) is smaller, although still 736.4MB. Never had much time for "testing", bug fixes usually take longer.

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Mon May 02, 2016 8:53 pm

Sorry for the late reply.

We are fixing our sources repo. It seems to be broken. (not the apps or files in it, just apt-get(ting) from it)

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Tue May 03, 2016 11:29 pm

Having set the antiX nosystemd packages as a "local" repo using reprepro, the same problem as with angband.pl occurs here in "unstable" (i.e. bash-completion will be removed). Seems to do with util-linux (-related) packages .. anticapitalista, can you confirm that (or not)?

Code:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  bash-completion xfce4-power-manager

Another thing I noticed is, apt no longer seems to allow "unsigned" repos, nor those without the appropriate keyring first installed. (E: on apt update, before it was only W:)

Since current Devuan policy is to permit libsystemd0 (at this time at least, I exclude *systemd*) I still want to test alternative builds of the affected packages and also want to support consolekit2 and eudev.

Hoping the antiX nosystemd repo can soon be fixed.. thanks antiX for the good work so far.

BTW I'm quite liking my antiX install, main problem has been getting my head around it's "live-boot" mechanism, quite different from Debian Live. Given the state of that project in recent times and it's uncertain future, it may well be worth the effort.

.. nadir, how goes it for you with "testing"?

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Wed May 04, 2016 10:29 am

1. Unsigned repos - yes we are fixing that (as part of reorganising the repos)
2. I run sid repos and have bash-completion

Code:
dpkg -s bash-completion
Package: bash-completion
Status: install ok installed
Priority: standard
Section: shells
Installed-Size: 1220
Maintainer: Bash Completion Maintainers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Architecture: all
Multi-Arch: foreign
Version: 1:2.1-4.3
Replaces: bash, cryptsetup (<< 2:1.1.2-2), xen-tools (<= 4.1-1)
Depends: bash (>= 3.2)
Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.15.7.2~)
Breaks: xen-tools (<= 4.1-1)
Conffiles:
/ etc/bash_completion a81b3f1cb197219b815942f4fc7fa94e
/ etc/profile.d/bash_completion.sh 749e4786543bc3d19e20b0e214806c35


util-linux
Code:
dpkg -s util-linux
Package: util-linux
Essential: yes
Status: install ok installed
Priority: required
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 3323
Maintainer: Debian util-linux Maintainers <ah-util-linux@debian.org>
Architecture: amd64
Multi-Arch: foreign
Version: 2.28-1.0nosystemd2
Replaces: bash-completion (<< 1:2.1-4.1~), initscripts (<< 2.88dsf-59.2~), mount (= 2.26.2-3), mount (= 2.26.2-3ubuntu1), sysvinit-utils (<< 2.88dsf-59.1~)
Depends: sysvinit-utils (>= 2.88dsf-59.1~)
Pre-Depends: libblkid1 (>= 2.25), libc6 (>= 2.15), libfdisk1 (>= 2.28~rc1), libmount1 (>= 2.25), libncursesw5 (>= 6), libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1), libreadline6 (>= 6.0), libselinux1 (>= 1.32), libsmartcols1 (>= 2.28~rc1), libtinfo5 (>= 6), libudev1 (>= 183), libuuid1 (>= 2.16), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4)
Suggests: dosfstools, kbd | console-tools, util-linux-locales
Breaks: bash-completion (<< 1:2.1-4.1~), cloud-utils (<< 0.27-1~), grml-debootstrap (<< 0.68), mount (= 2.26.2-3), mount (= 2.26.2-3ubuntu1)
Conffiles:
/ etc/default/hwclock 3916544450533eca69131f894db0ca12
/ etc/init.d/hwclock.sh 1ca5c0743fa797ffa364db95bb8d8d8e
/ etc/pam.d/runuser b8b44b045259525e0fae9e38fdb2aeeb
/ etc/pam.d/runuser-l 2106ea05877e8913f34b2c77fa02be45


I don't have xfce4-power-manager
Code:
apt-get install xfce4-power-manager
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
xfce4-power-manager : Depends: xfce4-power-manager-data (= 1.4.4-4) but 1.4.4-4.0nosystemd1 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


Let me rebuild xfce4-power-manager

Re: upgrade to testing fails

Wed May 04, 2016 12:17 pm

Found the main problem.. Devuan's bash-completion version (1:2.1-4.1+devuan2) hasn't caught up yet with sid, it's not compatible with "mount" => 2.28 (part of util-linux, I'm holding them all at 2.27.1-1+devuan0.1 for now)

This also might be to do with a devuan (or angband.pl) package, don't know yet. I have at the moment only devuan-merged configured plus (locally) antiX-nosystemd. No mainstream Debian repos.

Code:
:/# apt install -s xfce4-power-manager-data

#SNIP

Recommended packages:
  xfce4-power-manager
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  xfce4-power-manager
The following packages will be upgraded:
  xfce4-power-manager-data


Everything else went normally for dist-upgrade, (not many) antiX versions are now installed.
Post a reply