Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:31 am
fsmithred wrote:Below is the revised vnc section. See if it makes more sense than the previous. I may have missed some of those toward the end.
fsmithred wrote:The root password is root.
The user password is user.
The next sentence starts here.
fsmithred wrote:Edit: new package list will come with rc1, and I'll just name it "package_list" so that the link does not need changing.
fsmithred wrote:Well, there shouldn't be any changes in the packages once we're at rc1 anyway.
Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:58 am
I just looked at the text version, and both passwords are on one line, and it looks fine. I was keeping it under 78 characters, so it would fit on a console screen without wrapping. The html version with each on one line looks good, but now I'm not sure if it's really better than both on one line. Trying to hallucinate that here. Your artistic opinion on that?golinux wrote:fsmithred wrote:The root password is root.
The user password is user.
The next sentence starts here.
Done.
You pulled it off ibiblio last week. Yes, rename it to package_list.txt, and I'll just replace it with the newer one.All the documents are in the docs folder of the site. I retained the name of the package list that I copied (can't remember from where) - package_list_beta9.txt. Should I just rename it to package_list.txt? (It needs the .txt to open properly.)
Which brings up another point - our numbering scheme for refracta might be confusing. It looks just like the numbering scheme for debian, but only the first digit is the same between refracta and debian versions. I was thinking about either dropping the last digit or removing the decimal points. So we'd be at 7.0 or maybe 701 when wheezy goes stable. I also haven't decided if I'm going to drop the "wheezy" from the name of the name of the iso. Opinions and ideas, please?Over on FDN (or on the list) I remember something about rc1 being for the installer not wheezy itself because releases don't use rc#s.
Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:48 pm
fsmithred wrote:I just looked at the text version, and both passwords are on one line, and it looks fine. I was keeping it under 78 characters, so it would fit on a console screen without wrapping. The html version with each on one line looks good, but now I'm not sure if it's really better than both on one line. Trying to hallucinate that here. Your artistic opinion on that?golinux wrote:fsmithred wrote:The root password is root.
The user password is user.
The next sentence starts here.
Done.
fsmithred wrote:You pulled it off ibiblio last week. Yes, rename it to package_list.txt, and I'll just replace it with the newer one.All the documents are in the docs folder of the site. I retained the name of the package list that I copied (can't remember from where) - package_list_beta9.txt. Should I just rename it to package_list.txt? (It needs the .txt to open properly.)
fsmithred wrote:Which brings up another point - our numbering scheme for refracta might be confusing. It looks just like the numbering scheme for debian, but only the first digit is the same between refracta and debian versions. I was thinking about either dropping the last digit or removing the decimal points. So we'd be at 7.0 or maybe 701 when wheezy goes stable. I also haven't decided if I'm going to drop the "wheezy" from the name of the name of the iso. Opinions and ideas, please?
fsmithred wrote:Anyway, the "rc1" I was going to put on the name has nothing to do with the "rc1" on the debian installer. Too confusing?
fsmithred wrote:I want the next iso I put up to be obviously something more baked than "beta". Refracta-7-almostbaked? Refracta-seven-stable-minus-one? Do I need another cup of coffee?
fsmithred wrote:I hope to go through both the text and html release notes side by side this weekend, finish writing the additional parts and give you the final edits.
Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:57 pm
Sat Mar 02, 2013 8:14 pm
fsmithred wrote:I want the next iso I put up to be obviously something more baked than "beta". Refracta-7-almostbaked? Refracta-seven-stable-minus-one? Do I need another cup of coffee?
Better than beer at this hour. Or skip the coffee and take a kung fu break. Much better way to get going.
Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:33 am
Loosely based on LinuxBBQ Boner
Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:32 pm
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:19 pm
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:57 pm
golinux wrote:Can we please keep this thread to the project at hand? Static like this makes it harder to locate relevant info. Maybe the BBQ stuff could get moved to a separate thread? Thanks.
Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:04 pm
fsmithred wrote:I'm mostly done with the release notes and working on the readme files for installer, snapshot and 2usb. I assume you want all the changes at once. It won't be finished today.